NEW YORK STATE'S COSH MOVEMENT: A BRIEF HISTORYNew Solution: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 2018, Vol. 28(2) 202-226Michael B. Lax, MD, MPHUnions, health and safety activists, and professionals came together to create Coalitions for Occupational Safety and Health (COSH groups) in a number of cities across the United States beginning in the 1970s. The COSHes have played an impor-tant and unique role in advocating worker health and safety since that time, through activities including technical assistance, training and education, and campaigns on workplace and public policies. In New York State, activist coalitions created eight COSH groups distributed around the state. This paper presents a history of New York’s COSHes based on interviews with key participants. The interviews shed light on the origins of the COSH movement in New York, the development and activities of the COSHes, and the organizational trajectory of individual New York COSHes in response to both extra and intraorganizational challenges. Participants’ accounts of these issues may be useful for those seeking to sustain the COSH movement.Click here to read full articleNOT QUITE A WIN–WIN: THE CORPORATE AGENDA OF THE STAY AT WORK/RETURN TO WORK PROJECTThe idea that efforts are necessary to transform the dominant framework of workplace safety and health in the United States, from one of compensation and disability to one of stay at work/return to work (SAW/RTW) for workers injured or made ill on the job, has become increasingly widespread. SAW/RTW advocates argue that everyone “wins” when unnecessary disability is reduced. Toward this end, advocates have put forward a program and implemented a strategy with strong proponents among a coalition of corporate-connected professionals. The seemingly obvious conclusions of their arguments bear closer critical scrutiny, however. Addressing key questions—why injured workers do not SAW/RTW, who the coalition of SAW/RTW proponents includes, and what the coalition proposes—reveals that the SAW/RTW approach mainly benefits employers and the corporate-connected advocates. These assertions are detailed, and principles of an alternative approach that will serve the needs of injured workers are outlined.By: Michael B. Lax, MD, MPHView Publication>>WORK, ENVIRONMENT, AND HEALTHBreast cancer risk in relation to occupations with exposure to carcinogens and endocrine disruptors: a Canadian case-control studyBy: James T Brophy, Margaret M Keith, Andrew Watterson, Robert Park, Michael Gilbertson, Eleanor Maticka-Tyndale, Matthias Beck, Hakam Abu-Zahra, , Kenneth Schneider, , Abraham Reinhartz, Robert DeMatteo and Isaac LuginaahView Publication >>Occupational safety and health criteria for responsible development of nanotechnologyBy: P. A. Schulte, C. L. Geraci, V. Murashov, E. D. Kuempel, R. D. Zumwalde, V. Castranova, M. D. Hoover, L. Hodson, K. F. MartinezView Publication >>OSHA NIOSH Hazard Alert: Worker Exposure to Silica during Hydraulic FracturingAlthough the hazards of silica dust has been known for hundreds of years, a recent federal investigation on fracking sites has found very high levels of silica dust exposures to workers. This document includes the findings and recommendations to control silica dust on fracking sites and other hazards in this industry.View Publication >>RECOGNITION, ASSESSMENTOccupational Injury and Illness Surveillance: Conceptual Filters Explain UnderreportingBy: Lenore S. Azaroff, Charles Levenstein, and David WegmanView Publication >>Participatory mapping of occupational hazards and disease among asbestos-exposed workers from a foundry and insulation complex in CanadaBy Keith MM, Brophy JT.View Publication >>HAZARDOUS EXPOSURES / ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTSWork-Related Spirometric Restriction in Flavoring Manufacturing WorkersBy: Kathleen Kreiss, MDView Publication >>Occupational upper airway disease: how work affects the noseBy:V. Hox, B. Steelant, W. Fokkens, B. Nemery & P. W. HellingsView Publication >>Job Strain and Ambulatory Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic ReviewBy: Paul Landsbergis, Marnie Dobson George Koutsouras and Peter SchnallView Publication >>PREVENTIONErgonomic design and training for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck in adults (Review)By: Hoe VCW, Urquhart DM, Kelsall HL, Sim MRView Publication >>SOCIAL CONTEXTSEffects of Social, Economic, and Labor Policies on Occupational Health DisparitiesBy: Carlos Eduardo Siqueira, Megan Gaydos, Celeste Monforton, Craig Slatin, Liz Borkowski, Peter Dooley, Amy Liebman, Erica Rosenberg, Glenn Shor, & Matthew KeiferView Publication >>Economic Burden of Occupational Injury and Illness in the United StatesBy: J. Paul LeighView Publication >>WORKERS' COMPENSATION RESEARCHReexamining Workers' Compensation: A Human Rights PerspectiveBy: Leslie I. BodenView Publication >>Workers' Compensation Benefits and Shifting Costs for Occupational Injury and IllnessBy: J. Paul Leigh and James P. MarcinView Publication >>
NEW YORK STATE'S COSH MOVEMENT: A BRIEF HISTORYNew Solution: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 2018, Vol. 28(2) 202-226Michael B. Lax, MD, MPHUnions, health and safety activists, and professionals came together to create Coalitions for Occupational Safety and Health (COSH groups) in a number of cities across the United States beginning in the 1970s. The COSHes have played an impor-tant and unique role in advocating worker health and safety since that time, through activities including technical assistance, training and education, and campaigns on workplace and public policies. In New York State, activist coalitions created eight COSH groups distributed around the state. This paper presents a history of New York’s COSHes based on interviews with key participants. The interviews shed light on the origins of the COSH movement in New York, the development and activities of the COSHes, and the organizational trajectory of individual New York COSHes in response to both extra and intraorganizational challenges. Participants’ accounts of these issues may be useful for those seeking to sustain the COSH movement.Click here to read full articleNOT QUITE A WIN–WIN: THE CORPORATE AGENDA OF THE STAY AT WORK/RETURN TO WORK PROJECTThe idea that efforts are necessary to transform the dominant framework of workplace safety and health in the United States, from one of compensation and disability to one of stay at work/return to work (SAW/RTW) for workers injured or made ill on the job, has become increasingly widespread. SAW/RTW advocates argue that everyone “wins” when unnecessary disability is reduced. Toward this end, advocates have put forward a program and implemented a strategy with strong proponents among a coalition of corporate-connected professionals. The seemingly obvious conclusions of their arguments bear closer critical scrutiny, however. Addressing key questions—why injured workers do not SAW/RTW, who the coalition of SAW/RTW proponents includes, and what the coalition proposes—reveals that the SAW/RTW approach mainly benefits employers and the corporate-connected advocates. These assertions are detailed, and principles of an alternative approach that will serve the needs of injured workers are outlined.By: Michael B. Lax, MD, MPHView Publication>>WORK, ENVIRONMENT, AND HEALTHBreast cancer risk in relation to occupations with exposure to carcinogens and endocrine disruptors: a Canadian case-control studyBy: James T Brophy, Margaret M Keith, Andrew Watterson, Robert Park, Michael Gilbertson, Eleanor Maticka-Tyndale, Matthias Beck, Hakam Abu-Zahra, , Kenneth Schneider, , Abraham Reinhartz, Robert DeMatteo and Isaac LuginaahView Publication >>Occupational safety and health criteria for responsible development of nanotechnologyBy: P. A. Schulte, C. L. Geraci, V. Murashov, E. D. Kuempel, R. D. Zumwalde, V. Castranova, M. D. Hoover, L. Hodson, K. F. MartinezView Publication >>OSHA NIOSH Hazard Alert: Worker Exposure to Silica during Hydraulic FracturingAlthough the hazards of silica dust has been known for hundreds of years, a recent federal investigation on fracking sites has found very high levels of silica dust exposures to workers. This document includes the findings and recommendations to control silica dust on fracking sites and other hazards in this industry.View Publication >>RECOGNITION, ASSESSMENTOccupational Injury and Illness Surveillance: Conceptual Filters Explain UnderreportingBy: Lenore S. Azaroff, Charles Levenstein, and David WegmanView Publication >>Participatory mapping of occupational hazards and disease among asbestos-exposed workers from a foundry and insulation complex in CanadaBy Keith MM, Brophy JT.View Publication >>HAZARDOUS EXPOSURES / ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTSWork-Related Spirometric Restriction in Flavoring Manufacturing WorkersBy: Kathleen Kreiss, MDView Publication >>Occupational upper airway disease: how work affects the noseBy:V. Hox, B. Steelant, W. Fokkens, B. Nemery & P. W. HellingsView Publication >>Job Strain and Ambulatory Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic ReviewBy: Paul Landsbergis, Marnie Dobson George Koutsouras and Peter SchnallView Publication >>PREVENTIONErgonomic design and training for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck in adults (Review)By: Hoe VCW, Urquhart DM, Kelsall HL, Sim MRView Publication >>SOCIAL CONTEXTSEffects of Social, Economic, and Labor Policies on Occupational Health DisparitiesBy: Carlos Eduardo Siqueira, Megan Gaydos, Celeste Monforton, Craig Slatin, Liz Borkowski, Peter Dooley, Amy Liebman, Erica Rosenberg, Glenn Shor, & Matthew KeiferView Publication >>Economic Burden of Occupational Injury and Illness in the United StatesBy: J. Paul LeighView Publication >>WORKERS' COMPENSATION RESEARCHReexamining Workers' Compensation: A Human Rights PerspectiveBy: Leslie I. BodenView Publication >>Workers' Compensation Benefits and Shifting Costs for Occupational Injury and IllnessBy: J. Paul Leigh and James P. MarcinView Publication >>